Kayla Cross vs Ema Burgic Bucko Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

How do Bucko and Cross stack up when it comes to their second serve? For the past six months, Bucko has clinched 34.15% of their second serve points, compared to Cross, who manages a slightly stronger 40.24%. This subtle edge in second serve performance often hints at the likely match winner.

When examining their return game, Bucko displays a formidable prowess, securing 59.62% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Cross manages 49.02%. For those curious about first serve return efficiency, Bucko continues to shine with 35.98% compared to Cross’s 31.39%. In tight matches, this could be a deciding factor.

It’s always intriguing to see how players handle pressure, especially when facing breakpoints. Bucko shows an impressive breakpoint save rate of 47.62%, outpacing Cross, who saves 42.47% of such situations. This capability under pressure can often sway the in-game dynamics, providing useful bets for those observing the game closely.

If you're curious about their overall performance over the last year, Bucko has won 60.78% of their matches, while Cross has a slightly better win percentage at 65.43%. Interestingly, both players exhibit their best performances on hard courts, winning 64% of matches. However, Bucko struggles on indoor hard courts with only a 17% win rate, whereas Cross maintains a more respectable 53% on the same surface.

When delving into tournament participation, Bucko has been predominantly seen on the Challengers/ITF circuits, securing 58.54% wins, whereas Cross shines brighter with a 65.43% success rate over similar events. This distinction provides a nuanced perspective on their match readiness given the levels they consistently compete at.

A direct glance at their head-to-head record reveals Bucko’s dominance, winning their sole face-off against Cross, which occurred at the W 75 Sumter on hard courts. Though Cross stole one set in their previous duel which lasted an average of 3 hours and 42 minutes, Bucko emerged victorious after an intense battle.

When facing deciding sets against all opponents, Bucko seems to have a stronghold, clinching victory 73% of the time, as opposed to Cross’s 67%. Despite Cross having a slight edge in tiebreaks, winning one against Bucko, it may not be enough if this match stretches into another gruelling decider.

Overall, given their historical and recent performances, Bucko’s consistent ability to navigate pressure and convert breakpoints leans the prediction scale in their favor. If the pattern of play is any indication, Bucko seems poised to take this upcoming match with poise and strategy on their side.